Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading
The lecture explained that the altruistic behavior of meerkats gives them some advantages in the group. There the following three advantages.
First of all, the lecturer believes that the eating habit of meerkats benefit the sentinel’s group as it eats before guarding the rest of the group. This idea disagrees with the article that states that sentinel stays without food while the rest of the group eat food.
Secondly, the lecture states that the sentinel is the first animal to see the predator which gives it a great chance to survivor because it can run away immediately after it gives the alarm. In contrast, it is stated in the reading passage that the group is able to keep safe and survive while the sentinel is at more risk since it has to escape alone.
Finally, the lecture mentions humans donors of organs that gain society’s appreciation and approval. In addition, they feel valuable, improving their self worth and proud. The reading passage, however, states that such an act provides little reward and donors gain nothing for themselves.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 76
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - altruism behavior/meerkat 3
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 177.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5655192427 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1146094331 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0708109922092 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297148686689 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221938934153 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0453355104627 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202139075471 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.