task 1
The reading proposes that replacement hydrogen-based fuel-cell instead of oil power engine has some advantages. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
The author argues that due to the fact that hydrogen cannot end up. Also, it is an available and renewable source as opposed to petroleum. .Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that that Hydrogen is not easily available .although it is found in water, but it cannot be used directly. First, hydrogen must be purred and turn to the liquid state. This is an artificial substance. Hence, the technology needed to produce it is difficult. It cannot be in a cold temperature. Therefore, it is needed elaborated technology. So, it is not practical and available.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that hydrogen-based fuel cells solve pollution problems due to the fact that it can produce water. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that although this fuel-cell does not produce pollution but producing pure hydrogen produces lot pollutions. Factories purring hydrogen need lots of energy. They burn coal and oil to get this energy. So burning these materials make pollution. Although cars do not pollute, factories polluted the air.
Finally, the reading asserts that this fuel-cell is economic and people spend less money on it. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that for manufacturing hydrogen factories need platinum metal which is the expensive one. Without it, manufacturing hydrogen cannot undergo chemical reactions. If cheap materials substitute for platinum it would not be a safe and successful way
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-10 | Tran Cat Su | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | zahrap | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | noushinhaddad | view | |
| 2022-01-08 | noushinhaddad | 70 | view |
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 72
- Some people offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. 60
- integrated task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...newable source as opposed to petroleum. .Conversely, the lecturer brings up the i...
^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Conversely
...ewable source as opposed to petroleum. .Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at that Hydrogen is not easily available .although it is found in water, but it ca...
^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needed elaborated" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'elaborating' or 'to be elaborated'.
Suggestion: elaborating; to be elaborated
...ld temperature. Therefore, it is needed elaborated technology. So, it is not practical and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31835205993 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88807518454 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9563121037 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.619047619 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7142857143 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.