According to the reading passage, it is stated that nowadays, fishers build some artificial reefs from old metal objects and industrial materials to provide shelter for fish and thus help to increase fish population. The article expresses some benefits of this action. However, the lecturer rebutes the assumptions made in the reading passage and presents three solid reasons to challenge them.
Firstly, the reading claims that artificial reefs creates a field for fish to gather and breed so, the fish numbers that can be caught will rise up. The professor casts doubt on this point by saying that reefs attract fish to them and it makes fish to congregate in a single location. As a result, since the fish crowd is in one place, their possibility to be caught will rise. He states this approach acts conversely and fish numbers decline rather than going up.
Secondly, the article posits that by creating private artificial reefs in secret locations, small-scale fishers would have a chance to compete with large corporations in the industry. In contrast, the professor says that this way may result in safety problems. According to him, by not being aware of the private reef locations, large nets owned by other fishers can be crash into secret reefs and cause several difficulties.
Finally, the reading says that other advantage of creating artificial reefs is that materials that aren't used can be recycled. The professor opposes this point by exemplifying the Osborne reef, that were made out of car tires. He declares that storm made this reef loose and eventually it caused some environmental damage by harming many animal and plant species, which were living on the seafloor. Therefore, unlike what the passage notes, instead of benefiting the fish population, this technique cause more problems.
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example 88
- TPO 04 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 73
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 80
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...three solid reasons to challenge them. Firstly, the reading claims that artific...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... numbers decline rather than going up. Secondly, the article posits that by cre...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reefs and cause several difficulties. Finally, the reading says that other adv...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...artificial reefs is that materials that arent used can be recycled. The professor opp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14237288136 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58129305375 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8943536883 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188306581153 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628806610507 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525846029108 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116817060797 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027814563623 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.