TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th

The reading and lecture are both about the settlements of Chaco Canyon and how they were used. The author of the reading believes that they were early buildings of the future. The lecturer casts doubts made in the article. He says that they were building high, because they were just built that way, and served no specific value.

First of all, the author points out that they buildings were very gig and this reminded them about the apartments in the south. It mentions that the apartment buildings in the south were lived in for a long time, and this may have been from the Chaco. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that the house had no fireplace. There was no way for them to possibly live in residential.

Secondly, the author contends that the buildings were used as food storage. The article notes that the main crop for the people was grained maize. This could be stored for a long time without rotting. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He says that there was no sign of maize. He elaborates on this by saying that if there was no grain then there was no way that it could be a storage of food.

Finally, the author states that they were used as ceremonial centers. The article establishes on this by saying that they found a lot of broken pots, which meant that after they ate the foods, they threw out the pots. The lecturer disagrees with these statements. He says that the pots used were not used in ceremonies. He establishes on this by saying that most native Americans did not do this.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hey were early buildings of the future. The lecturer casts doubts made in the artic...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57090909091 5.08290768461 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24235413486 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501818181818 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8254474455 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.85 110.228320801 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.75 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295395253071 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955211809497 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693994005192 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188915492818 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535556866673 0.0443174109184 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 13.3589403974 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 12.2367328918 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.