tpo 14 salvage logging benefits
The material discusses the concept of salvage logging. While the reading posits that this approach has many benefits for a aforest and the economy, the listening disagrees and states that salvage logging could cause serious long-term environmental damage.
First, the author mentions that cleaning up the dead trees helps new trees to grow. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and explains that removing the dead trees is not necessary for other trees to grow. The lecturer adds that dead trees could enrich the soils with nutrients that could benefit new trees. The speaker claims that cleaning up dead trees after the fire removes these natural nutrients, which are essentila for new trees to grow.
Second, the writer states that salvage logging helps to diminsh the dangers of insect infestation. On the contrary, the professor refutes this and says that the super barck beetles have found in forests for hungrad of years and did not have severe danger. The professor adds that these insects could be used by birds to perform a healthy forest. The speaker concludes that salvage logging causes more harm to environment than these insects.
Third, the reading points out that salvage logging has an economic benefits. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and states that salvage logging has small financial benefits, which does not last for a long time. Furthermore, the lecturer adds that this approach should use helicopter, which is very expoensive. In addition to that, the speaker explains that the jobs that could be created by salvage logging are temprorary and could be filled from outside. The professor explains that outside workers could have more experience than the local residential has.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat this approach has many benefits for a aforest and the economy, the listening ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, second, so, third, while, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23465703971 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39936717015 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512635379061 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0145649549 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395213565089 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134633948945 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494709640942 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224757477069 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531514340221 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.