tpo 19
In the reading, the author provides three reasons to explain that why buzzing, hiring people so as to promote products, should be banned. On the other hand, a student buzzing for a company criticizes it, maintaining they are misleading reasons and they cannot be true. He expands on his idea by bringing three main explanations.
First, the reading holds that since the consumers don't know that person doing the Buzzing is being paid, it is not fair because they are more likely to hear incorrect information. On the contrary, the student challenges this opinion with an opposite view which posits that Buzzing is not like the ordinary advertising and it can't make a difference if they know that he is being paid. He points out that because he is a user of the products he is saying the truth to everyone, proving the point mentioned in the reading to be incorrect.
Second, the reading mentions that as the consumers don't know about the buzzers, they could be harmed because they criticize the products less than when they know them. Contrary to reading, this idea is refuted by the student and he thinks that the consumers asking them a lot of questions, from the price to service, hear whatever they want to know. As a result, they don't buy the goods if the buzzers didn't have the real answers. The reading view, thus, does not hold up.
Finally, although this idea that Buzzing can affect the social relationships passed with strong support from reading, it is at odds with the student's view and he believes that it will do more good than harm. The consumers can trust them because they are always saying the truth to them. For example, the buzzers tried the phone before and then they buzz it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...explain that why buzzing, hiring people so as to promote products, should be banned. On ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... reading holds that since the consumers dont know that person doing the Buzzing is b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ot like the ordinary advertising and it cant make a difference if they know that he ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...ot like the ordinary advertising and it cant make a difference if they know that he ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... reading mentions that as the consumers dont know about the buzzers, they could be h...
^^^^
Line 6, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er they want to know. As a result, they dont buy the goods if the buzzers didnt have...
^^^^
Line 6, column 403, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... they dont buy the goods if the buzzers didnt have the real answers. The reading view...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, thus, as to, for example, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72575250836 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37171148754 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3876067568 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420383542648 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152222478362 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104671602261 0.0662205650399 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259599094133 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430603337061 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.