TPO 27 integrated
Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the possible reasons caused litte ice age. The reading passage proposes three possible reasons, while the lecture disagees with them.
First, the writer suggests that the disruption of the Gulf Stream affected Earth's climate. However, the lecturer argures that the Gulf Stream should only affect in Europe and the U.S. but not sounth area such as Newziland and Africa.
Secondly, the writer claims that volcanic eruption created dust which blocked sunlight and decreased the global temperatures, but the lecturer disagrees. Despite there was enough dust to block sunlight, the lecturer disputes that the dust produced some special effects such as color sunset, too. But for now, no report supported this idea.
Last but not the least, the writer says that declining in human populations increased the number of trees in forests which decreases the greenhouse effect. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes that the time period of population decline was not long enough for trees to grow up. According to the record, there was only a short period of population decline, and then human population increased again soon.
In sum, the lecturer does not agree with the reading passage and offers strong and obvious evidence to support his idea.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28292682927 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36829142699 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4717295988 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219447903949 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838721468238 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506127636478 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100449446804 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482373495763 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.