TPO 32

Essay topics:

TPO 32

The reading and lecture are both about cause of strange sound which Russian marine patrolling had been hearing until the 1980's. The author of the reading suggested three possible explanation about the sound, which was challenged by the lecturer.

Firstly, in the reading, it is stated that the unfamiliar sound was caused by Orca whales, which lives near to the place where sound was detected and noise of the whales is similar to the thing heard. Nonetheless, the lecturer refutes this idea by mentioning that the whales are situated near to the surface of ocean while submarines were traveling in a deep location. Therefore, the sound made by the whales is not capable of reaching the submarines. Moreover, the whales would have detected by sonar if it had swum near to the ships.

Secondly, the author states that the technology is unable to detect the giant squid due to absence of the skeleton. The animal traveled near to the submarine because of their peculiarity and emitted sound. This specific argument was challenged by the lecturer. The extraordinary noise was being detected until 1980 and has not observed again while the squids are still existing in the area. Therefore, the sound would have been noticed if cause of the sound was the squid.

Finally, according to the reading, it was probably the submarine of the other nations and reason why it was not detected was advanced technology which the another submarines used. The lecturer, however, refutes this explanation by mentioning that detected sound was changing the direction briskly and any engine sound was notices. On the other hand, any submarines was produced with such advanced technology that it can change its direction rapidly and has no engine noise so far.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-22 CeLinG 80 view
2023-08-14 adaxvier view
2022-11-28 Almendra 70 view
2022-11-24 jimHsu 80 view
2021-10-03 Ereny Tawfik 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user DaVa20011218 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...und which Russian marine patrolling had been hearing until the 1980s. The author of the read...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04844290657 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54236502649 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494809688581 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9878030638 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.214285714 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352360750492 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128375354288 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539646520134 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219868932962 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436428479434 0.0443174109184 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.