TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task
The author of reading passage explores three major functions of carved stone balls. However, in the lecture the professor contradicts all the assertion by using specific points as supports.
At first, the reading passage mentions that stone balls might be hunting weapons because there are grooves and holes on the surface of ball which means that they were used as holding balls for throwing them. While, the professor explains that Neolithic weapons like arrows have the sign of being utilized, but the surface of the stone balls do not have these signs.
Additionally, although the author points that the balls were used as standard unit of measurement due to their uniform size, the lecturer states that the density of these balls are different because they were made from various types of stone. So, they were not able to represent standard system of weighing for trade purpose.
Finally, the author in reading passage asserts that the carved stone balls marked the importance of their owner's social condition. On the other hand, the lecturer says that non of the balls were found in the grave of important persons and as a result they are not the mark of high social status because in the past, important objects were put in the graves along with dead body of important people.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 60
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 42
- It is better to do one project first and then begin to do another than to do several projects at the same time. 73
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95852534562 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26063053675 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557603686636 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3821888558 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456815135831 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192429986729 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989078134445 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262059970659 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104841009135 0.0443174109184 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.