TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm
The reading brought up three reasons that coal ash, a waste product that is elicited from burining coal, should not be strictly handled. However, the lecturer casts doubts on this claim by saying that there should be even stricter rules to handle and dispose this chemical. She refutes each of the author's points.
First, that there has been a set of strict rules already about this problem, as the reading claims, is rejected by the professor. She explains that current regulations about adopting liner material is inadequate. Since it just requires companies to use it on new landfills and ponds, not the old ones. However, at older landfills, liner leaks into the soil and contaminates the surrounding environment. So, there should be stricter rules that force companies to use liner not only on new landfills, but also on the old ones.
Second, the passage argues that strict rules for handling and storing coal ash may discourage the process of recycling it into useful materials that are bought by customers. It is a possiblity that customers also are discouraged from buying products that are created from coal ash. On the contrary, the professor posits that adopting stricter rules does not necessarily mean that customers will not buy the coal ash based products. For example, there were a kind of material, namely mercurary which also had strict rules for storing and handling. Customer willingly bought this product without paying attention to strict rules.
Third, the author makes a point that enacting strict rules would yield to a major increase in handling costs for the power companies and in this situation, they will have to increase the price of electricity. In contrast, the professor claims that even if it imposes high costs, it will be worth it. For example, an analyzer explains that if this process costs almost fifteen billion dollars for a company, it will result in just one percent increase in the price of electricity for consumers. The professor thinks that this amount of increase would be worth keeping the environment cleaner.
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 72
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 83
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree: When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 73
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, for example, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07331378299 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53335774474 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527859237537 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9942325913 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.764705882 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439344610477 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127294432861 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894170750674 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237802931837 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612305090297 0.0443174109184 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.