TPO 33:
Agree/Disagree: When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone.
There is no doubt that projects play a key role in human beings' life as they are a credible source of learning. Teachers adopt various methods to teach students how to manage their time, learn efficiently, and in turn, prepare themselves for their future life. Views differ when it comes to the issue of whether students should work together toward an assigned project or not. Although some people may hold the idea of working independently on a project, I firmly believe that working on projects as a group is more efficient. Because not only will students learn how to cooperate with other people effectively to provide themselves with a promising future, but also they will have more time to specialize in a particular aspect of the project which is assigned to them.
The first reason coming to my mind in the first place is that working collaboratively is more effective because it will help students future. To be more specific, most companies are interested in hiring those people who have experienced teamwork. This is due to the increasing need of doing projects which have become more complicated than they were in past. That is, these kinds of projects entail them to work across different aspects of projects in alliance with others simultaneously. To illustrate, suppose a computer science student who has recently graduated from his university. After graduation, he probably wants to apply for prospective job positions which are offered by IT (i.e. Information Technology) companies. It is crystal clear that if the applicant does not meet the companies' requirement, he will fail in negotiating with it. So, in order to have a promising future career, students had better prepare themselves at schools working collaboratively and then at an appropriate time, apply for job positions.
The second reason which also deserves some words is that by carrying out projects with the help of other students, students will provide themselves with an opportunity to increase their knowledge in a specific aspect of a project. To clarify more, there is notion named "division of labor" by which team leaders can adopt to produce beneficial results out of a project. In this process, manifold activities are broken down into different tasks and then these tasks are assigned to team members. During this process, project managers can easily monitor the progression of the project. Moreover, because team members are supposed to deliver their assigned task in a limited amount of time, they can plan to complete that task. Additionally, they will find more time to learn more and more about the backbone idea of the assigned task and this will, in turn, provide them with an opportunity to develop new techniques to end up the project successfully.
In the final analysis, it is my deep belief that working on projects as a whole has numerous advantages due to the aforementioned reasons including providing a promising future especially prospective career opportunities, and also grabbing more time and opportunities to explore the underlying concepts behind the project more deeply. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that teaching students how to work cooperatively will benefit our society in almost every aspect.
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 72
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 100
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 83
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree: When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 73
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... that projects play a key role in human beings life as they are a credible source of l...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... become more complicated than they were in past. That is, these kinds of projects entai...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...that if the applicant does not meet the companies requirement, he will fail in negotiatin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...f labor' by which team leaders can adopt to produce beneficial results out of a pro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, no doubt, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2723.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1669829222 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89900848332 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 860.4 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0046131561 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0952380952 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311457518682 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943048520059 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604217486654 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20422080565 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587491093926 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.