TPO 42
The reading and listening passage have conflicting opinion about solutions to prevent birds to be harmed when they try to fly through glass windows. The author of the suggests three solutions. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and brings up three reasons to support it. he thinks none of them can effectually stop birds to be injured.
The first point the author makes is to replace regular glass with transparent in only one direction. It is mentioned that while birds cannot see through a window, they will consider it as a solid barrier. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that one-way glass reflects like mirror. He states that the birds still will fly three it because they will see reflection of sky and trees in that glass.
Secondly, the author contends that painting colorful line can be beneficial. The article notes that stripes will avoid the birds to fly through the window besides, people are able to see through the openings. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that the birds perceive the openings as open hole and still they will fly through it. she puts forward the idea this solution not only cannot solve the problem but also due to small openings the room will be dark.
Finally, the author states that creating artificial magnetic field can solve the problem. The article establishes that electromagnets can steer birds in a direction away from the building. This concept is refused by the lecturer which asserts that the birds use earth magnetic only for traveling long distances. For short distance, the use eyes and brightness of light therefore, this solution cannot be much effective.
In conclusion, the lecturer and the author appear to be in disagreement about how to prevents the birds from being injured by flying through building's windows. The author offers three ways to solve the problems, which are contradicted by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- TPO 30 60
- TPO 49Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons 80
- Tpo30 70
- TPO 41 80
- TPO43Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...author of the suggests three solutions. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... effectually stop birds to be injured. The first point the author makes is to repl...
^^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o replace regular glass with transparent in only one direction. It is mentioned t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98130841121 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50817318691 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526479750779 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3878016752 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500588422352 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14694966535 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897296879567 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26456628738 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839731484132 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.