TPO 42
Both of the provided materials are discussing protecting flying birds against the glass for birds can harm themselves by moving right into them, not being able to distinguish between open-air and glass surfaces. Then the reading proposes three solutions for this issue. Later, the lecturer refutes each of them since he believes none could be effective due to the nature of the birds.
First, the reading suggests that using one-way glass, glass which can only be seen through from one side, instead of regular glass would help the birds to discriminate the obstacle from the freeway and, consequently, change their direction. However, the professor opposes this point by stating that one-way glass is as harmful as ordinary glass to birds because the side that is not transparent has to be reflective. So, when birds see a reflection of the sun or any landscape, they assume it is an open area and will try to fly through. Thus, the inability of birds to grasp the concept of the mirror will overturn this idea.
Second, the reading avers another scheme that is using specific patterns on the glass while constructing it in order for birds to see it. The lecturer finds this solution hopeless since the openings between patterns say spaces between stripes, are still interpreted as open holes by birds. Therefore, they will try to pass the obstacle by flying through the openings. Moreover, for the birds to move around the building, the openings have to be really small; But that way, the rooms will be dark and somewhat not useful anymore. Again, the way that birds' minds work surpassed the second method.
Third, the reading makes another proposal by stating that artificial magnetic fields can help the birds to steer their ways around the buildings. Nonetheless, the professor explains even though it is true that birds rely on earth's magnetic field for navigation, but this is just the case in long trips, say intercontinental migrations. For a short journey across a city, birds use the lights and their perceptive organisms. So, the third proposal has its own drawbacks, as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, thus, well, while, as to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98571428571 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53740024434 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 145.348785872 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7058897652 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0625 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510618702806 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154418518981 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09369920814 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307243969509 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963350347445 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.