TPO 42 task 1

Essay topics:

TPO 42 task 1

The article introduces the topic of that since the glass has been used as an approved material in the modern buildings that caused birds to be injured when they fly. More specifically, the writer discusses that there are three ways to prevent them from being wounded. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees. he believes that none of these solutions is certainly worthwhile and attacks each of the claims made in the reading.
First of all, in the reading, the author begins by stating that one-way glass could be altered instead of typical ones. The lecturer, However, disproves. he states that the surface of kind of glass is like a mirror which is not distinguishable for birds. he goes on to say that if they the reflection of the sky or tree in a mirror, they will fly right into them.
Secondly, the author also claims that some colorful lines on other designs on common window glass would solve this problem. Again, the professor thinks that there are flaws in the writer's argument. he holds the that birds may assume there are holes on these patterns, so they will fly right through them unless the majority of the glass spaces are painted which creates the rooms of the buildings too dark.
Finally, the reading claims that an artificial magnetic field to conduct birds away from buildings. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt by saying that they use the earth's magnetic when they are traveling long distances. he clarifies this issue by explaining that birds use eyes and brightness of the light to navigate for short trips.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about how to prevent birds from being hurt by the window glass, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged bt the speaker.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-06 hamidreza89 85 view
2017-12-26 alibl 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user hamidreza89 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rer in the listening passage disagrees. he believes that none of these solutions i...
^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ones. The lecturer, However, disproves. he states that the surface of kind of glas...
^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...which is not distinguishable for birds. he goes on to say that if they the reflect...
^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ssor thinks that there are flaws in the writers argument. he holds the that birds may a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...here are flaws in the writers argument. he holds the that birds may assume there a...
^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...when they are traveling long distances. he clarifies this issue by explaining that...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83881578947 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40825196876 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5499269774 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39593046969 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107344835259 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760356417339 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200292498653 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436704685592 0.0443174109184 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.