TPO 44
The passage and the lecture discuss a European silver coin dating to 1000 years ago that is found in Maine in the United States. The passage presents three ideas about why the coin could be fake; while the lecture argues against all of them and points out some clarification about why the reasons aren't convincing.
First of all, the reading claims the distance of Maine and the Norse settlements are extremely high; thus, the coin doesn't belong to them. However, the professor believes although the distance was great, there are many other objects except the coin that has been found in this kind of range of which belong to Europeans. The professor in the lecture believes, Indeed, native Americans who traveled a lot brought them to Maine.
In second, the passage asserts that no additional coins have been found on the site that Europeans were settled. However, the lecturer disputes this reason by pointing out when they came back from Europe. Actually, they took back all of their valuable staff include their coins. Thus, they assuredly bring silver coins with themselves.
Finally, the article claims the coins was useless for them because native Americans didn't recognize silver coins; thereby, the didn't need them at all. However, the lecturer refutes this opinion completely because the coins were attractive and beautiful that native Americans desired to have them. In fact, they used them as beauty staff like neckless or jewelry. Therefore, Europeans could utilize coins to trade with native Americans.
Although the passage presents three reasons that declare the coin found in Maine is fake, the professor in the lecture opposes with all of them and believes that none of them are convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ome clarification about why the reasons arent convincing. First of all, the reading...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ents are extremely high; thus, the coin doesnt belong to them. However, the professor ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...eless for them because native Americans didnt recognize silver coins; thereby, the di...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nt recognize silver coins; thereby, the didnt need them at all. However, the lecturer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1103202847 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30866794834 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533807829181 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3318308272 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424737009865 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154817655295 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756297407595 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23690187766 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483149894794 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.