TPO 46
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that medical record has been saved and stored on a paper base, but the reading suggested that doctors have several benefits by saving the medical record of patients base on the electronic database. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading point but providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading indicates that electronic records may reduce the cost of storage and transferring medical records, so doctors do not need a lot of paper for saving data and they only need a significant amount of storage space. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that doctors need to save previous data of patients for emergencies. So, they need to get back up from paper-based data and save them. In this situation, doctors not only must pay money for saving paper base data but also must pay money for saving electronic base data.
Furthermore, the reading indicates that electronic medical records can reduce medical errors because having bad handwriting or illegible make some errors when people want to read them, but by electronic medical records this error may be eliminated; conversely, what the professor believes is different. She points out that doctors adapting by paper base data, and when they want to examine patients, they use paper for visiting. In this situation, they use staffs for changing paper base data to electronic base data; indeed, staffs may make some handwriting errors when they read it.
Finally, according to the reading, electronic medical records make benefit situations for people who want to search for patients, and they do not need to consume many times for gathering data. However, the professor believes that people must follow strict rules when they want to access or use the medical records. In addition, electronic records also have very strict rules for saving data on the electronic base. Furthermore, when researchers want to use medical records, they must follow strict rules such as permitting patients. And most of them are block their medical data.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53355444435 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459064327485 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5430000594 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.142857143 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456176709613 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180736501464 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118007036679 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31130142791 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019909009122 0.0443174109184 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.