TPO 48 - Integrated writing
The reading asserts that the number of frogs have decreased in their environment significantly. The frogs' population help humans by eliminating some special kind of insect which spread diseases. Various methods have been utilized to preserve the frogs' population. On the other hand, the lecturer finds it farfetched to protect the frogs and finds the proposed solutions impractical because of some significant reasons which will be discussed respectively.
First of all, the author argues that frogs are being suffered from chemicals which are used in order to preserve farms from being destroyed by insects and the law should be set to prevent farmers to use those chemicals. In contrast, the lecturer rejects the proposed idea because farmers rely on those chemicals to preserve their farm and stay competitive in the market. So if the rules being set to make a restriction on utilizing pesticides, it's going to cause them severe disadvantages, besides this is not the rational and economical solution especially for the farmers.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that another major reason responsible for frogs' population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world since they utilize the frogs' skin to absorb water, consequently, the frogs die due to lack of water and dehydration. So some kind of treatment has been proposed to eliminate fungus. On the other hand, the professor criticizes the mentioned treatment because the proposed method should individually be applied to each frog which makes the method infeasible to applied on a large scale, moreover the complication and expenses of the treatment make it irrational to being used widely.
Finally, the passage asserts that since most frogs species lay their eggs in water and they are dependant on wetlands. On the other hand, many such habits are threatened by human activities such as draining waterlands in order to make them suitable for development. In contrast, the teacher rejects the proposed idea and revealed that global warming is the real frog's enemy which contributed to depleting waterlands and put the frogs' population endanger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | mmha21 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | fateme ozggoli | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | wsxedc | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Mamalhastam | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | SeehtEntity | 75 | view |
- TPO 47 70
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?•• A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree 80
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 63
- TPO 48 - Integrated writing 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...in their environment significantly. The frogs population help humans by eliminating s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...hods have been utilized to preserve the frogs population. On the other hand, the lect...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: IT_IS[19]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... a restriction on utilizing pesticides, its going to cause them severe disadvantage...
^^^
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...es lay their eggs in water and they are dependant on wetlands. On the other hand, many su...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 429, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...ted to depleting waterlands and put the frogs population endanger.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in contrast, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32058823529 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81237994746 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0932991823 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490271403934 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168603394817 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927271496427 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297160304767 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642522675609 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.