TPO 52 integrated
The reading and the lecture are both about sending humankind to live on an asteroid. The author of the reading feel that this is the best way for continuing humans life. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that option is not practical and have many down sides.
To begin with, the author argues that law gravity on asteroids such as Moon or Mars make some good points for spaceships. The article mentions that low gravity lets spacecrafts to consider immense tools to set up a colony. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer who belives that low gravity makes some risks for human body. He claims that living for a long time in a low gravity place causes to loosing muscle and bone density. Additionally, he says that low gravity may make bodies to suffer from many unknown problems.
Secondly, the writer suggest that vast number of important metals on asteroids could make money for the colonies. In the article, it is said that there are some rare elements on asteroids, for instance gold and platinum which are the best support for the people whose choice is living on another planet. The lecturer, However, rebuts this by mentioning that the reading makes an idealistic picture of the fact. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that costs of mining on another planet makes the deal impossible because of increasing in payments for supplying machines, sending the minerals to the earth, etc.
Finally, the author posits that getting to an asteroid would be reachable. more over, in the article it is stated that colonization on an asteroid which get closer to earth is easier than living on a planet like Mars. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that travel to an asteroid and then travelling from an asteroid to the Earth is a big challenge. He notes that return from an asteroid is not easy because they are far away from the Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
| 2021-03-18 | MaXi | 81 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | lilipo | 80 | view |
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific examples and reasons for your answers. 70
- Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer? 76
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 78
- Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands, others like to eat at home. Which do you prefer? Give reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
- Some companies have decided not to allow employees to discuss business by sending emails or messages on weekends Some people believe that this policy is great others believe that this policy will discourage employees What is your opinion and why 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he best way for continuing humans life. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
...ting to an asteroid would be reachable. more over, in the article it is stated that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74174174174 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44820084574 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537537537538 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8669988373 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8823529412 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.