tpo 54

Essay topics:

tpo 54

In the reading, the writer describes several ways that may reverse the salinity-increasing trend in Salion sea. However, in the lecture, the speakers say that all the three methods are actually unrealistic.

Firstly, the author claims that direct removal of salt from the lake's water by special desalination facilities is a method. But the professor argues that the left materials could not be sold. Although the left materials contain salt, it also contains toxic chemical that will be dangerous if people eat it. this means that the author's idea is unrealistic.

Secondly, the reading assumes that to dilute the salt level in the lake with water from the sea is another possible solution. While the lecturer says that the local administration doesn't have enough money to build the pipelines or canals. Since the lake is 100km away from the sea, these facilities will be very expensive, which rejects the thinking in the passage.

Thirdly, the writer asserts that constructing walls to divide the lake into some sections is also a possible solution. Yet the speaker argues that the area the lake is located in has a lot of geological activities, especially earthquakes. So even if the walls are built, they won't last for a long time and will be destroyed by a major earthquake. Then, the water in different sections will mix together. this fact rejects the point in the reading.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-24 YasamanEsml 90 view
2023-07-24 YasamanEsml 85 view
2023-07-20 Take 78 view
2023-07-20 Take 90 view
2023-07-20 Take 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user dzdzdz :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee methods are actually unrealistic. Firstly, the author claims that direct r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s if people eat it. this means that the authors idea is unrealistic. Secondly, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the authors idea is unrealistic. Secondly, the reading assumes that to di...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...urer says that the local administration doesnt have enough money to build the pipeline...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rejects the thinking in the passage. Thirdly, the writer asserts that constru...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n different sections will mix together. this fact rejects the point in the reading.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06493506494 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74819842653 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614718614719 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2052029192 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5714285714 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.