TPO 55
In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecturer discuss the problem of desertification which many trees dry and the lands become a desert. In this situation, scientists suggest that using a box-shaped device that collects water for trees can prevent desertification. Although the reading provides three theories to rejects the use of the box-shaped device, the speaker refutes these ideas through several reasons, which will be described in this report.
To start off, the passage points out that the cost of the box-shaped device is much expensive for each tree, so by this amount of money can growing millions of trees. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that by using a box-shaped device one tree become grow. And, when this tree become growing, people remove it, and they can use this box for other trees. She adds that this box can use for 22 times or more; hence, the price for each tree is not at a high level.
Going through the next approach, the reading passage states that local people who must maintain these devices would not accept to look after trees because they prefer to look after something that uses as a food source. However, the professor argues that putting some possible rewards or motivation for local people would be effective. For example, local people would allow using water which collects in the box-shape device for other plants like a vegetable. She adds that by growing trees local people allow using these branches for making a fire. These two reasons can motivate local people to take a part in a project.
To take into the end, although the passage says that water collects with this device is limited; hence, only small trees can use this amount of water, and it is not enough for big trees, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that this device helps young trees to grow long root. And, the long root can achieve a source of water which locates underground. Hence, trees can survive without this device. Furthermore, some research in the Sahara Desert shows that 90% of trees can live after removing this device.
- TPO 43 70
- TPO 34 85
- TPO 21 80
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing, people remove it, and they can use this box for other trees. She adds that this...
^^^^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...this box for other trees. She adds that this box can use for 22 times or more; hence...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88202247191 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34514058924 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0871044983 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501226606319 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190169787434 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791359937274 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325781396198 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302401678441 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing, people remove it, and they can use this box for other trees. She adds that this...
^^^^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...this box for other trees. She adds that this box can use for 22 times or more; hence...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88202247191 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34514058924 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497191011236 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0871044983 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501226606319 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190169787434 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791359937274 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325781396198 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302401678441 0.0443174109184 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.