tpo integrated 25
The lecture and the reading both discuss the clay jay excavated that have copper cylinder. The reading states that the vessels were not use as batteries and enumerates three reasons of support. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that the there are probability that the copper cylinder were using to conduct electricity.
First of all, the reading argues that. The absence of wire is proving that the cylinders were not used to conduct electricity. The lecture disagrees. It claims that the clay jay was excavated by local people. According to the professor, local people may think that the wire and other stuff found near the copper cylinder are not such important.
In addition, the reading states that there copper cylinder looks like other jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point by saying that the same shape of the cylinder is not prove that the copper cylinder are not conducting electricity. Furthermore, iron rode plus any liquid could produce electricity. The copper cylinder could adapt to any purpose.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that their no need for electricity during the ancient period. But, the lecture refutes. It claims that there is an invisible power for using the copper cylinder. For example, the copper cylinder may be used in medical treatment, such as major healing, or stimulate the muscles, or even relieve aches or pain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- building new factory 60
- why do people attract to difficult sports 60
- study with friends or with teachers 3
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 60
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
...eading states that the vessels were not use as batteries and enumerates three reaso...
^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd enumerates three reasons of support. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scroll' or simply 'scrolls'?
Suggestion: a scroll; scrolls
...s like other jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point by sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
...t the same shape of the cylinder is not prove that the copper cylinder are not conduc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, look, may, so, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4776280149 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510822510823 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4432191997 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5882352941 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361233038444 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1104555604 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765603225023 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225910478959 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349485277222 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.