TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - Turtle Excluder Device (TED)

Essay topics:

TPO - writing integrated task
Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - Turtle Excluder Device (TED)

The reading passage and the lecture are both about Turtle Excluder Device (TED). The lecturer completely refutes all the three arguments in the article. She argues that these explanations are faulty.

Firstly, the lecture states that the metal grid, that forms the metal barrier, is ineffective in prevent that turtles get caught because a lot of baby turtles and many turtle’s species that are smaller are still captured. Furthermore, shrimp are still capable to scape and remove such barriers. This directly opposes with the reading passage that states that the design of TED invention is one of the ineffable reasons to reduce the turtle’s deaths per year.

Secondly, the lecturer explains that is impossible that an organization can effectively monitor the application of the “Shrimp-Turtle Law” and the installation and maintenance of TED. This idea disagrees with the article that states that there are specific organizations to monitor and ensure these approaches.

Finally, the lecturer believes that since shrimp business is an international matter, the documentation required can be easily counterfeited in different countries and the organization can not recognize if it is real or bogus. The article, on the other hand, states that countries and companies will decide to comply and install TED to be able to continue in the shrimp business and export to US and some European counties.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-03 harsh12345555 80 view
2019-10-24 mike10m1 81 view
2019-07-31 Pri_Judy 3 view
2019-07-31 Pri_Judy 3 view
2019-07-28 Pri_Judy 86 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45248868778 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0371261844 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579185520362 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1676658195 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134985555547 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569946448201 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720930735422 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849830561842 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352892612442 0.0443174109184 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.