TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - voting system
The reading passage and the lecture are both voting systems. The lecturer completely refutes the arguments in the article. She argues that these explanations are faulty.
Firstly, the lecture states that people who are not used technology of computerized system may be discouraged to vote or encouter problems and difficulties to vote. This directly opposes the reading passage that sates that the easy touch screen of computerized system will facilitate the process of voting even for that people that have poor eyesight.
Secondly, the lecturer explains that errors made by computerized voting machines can be enormously worst than that made by counting votes one by one manually since thousands of votes can be miscounted or even lost. Furthermore, computerized programs are made by humans, therefore, they are suceptible to be wrong. This idea disagrees with the article that argues that computerized systems remove the possibility of human errors.
Finally, the lecturer believes that the nationwide technology already present at baking transactions or in communication took a long time to be improved and well stablish as they are today. Moreover, voting just occurs occasionaly which does not provide time to computerized system to achieve the people’s confidence. The reading passage, on the other hand, states that baking transactions and communications are important examples that people trust sensitive information to technological devices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
...rized voting machines can be enormously worst than that made by counting votes one by...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67272727273 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02893757115 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.581105394 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.454545455 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211701279276 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770274906533 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621092501054 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122369424062 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573100003297 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.