tpo31-1
The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is a fossil skeleton of a dinosaur was discoverd in china.
The article states that some paleontologists believe that the fossil is related to the feather, while critics thought suggested that the fossil skeleton is not feather and provides three reasons for support. However, in the lecture the professor refutes the idea presented in the passage and says that those reasons are not convincing and provides strong examples and clarifies the weaknesses that the idea has.
First, the passage posits that critics believe that the fine lines not related to any function for living dinosaurs. In fact, they belong to a dead dinosaur after a volcanic ash. In contrast, the professor refutes this point by saying that there is no other evidences of decomposition in the same cite. In his opinion, these feathers were using for showing animals beauty.
Second, the reading says that the skeleton are similar to frills not feathor. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this, suggesting that there is a chemical different between frill and feather components. Feathers have a protein called Beta-carotein, but frills don't have this material in their structure.
Third, according to the article's opinion, animal uses feathers for flying or adjusting of their internal temperature. The professor doesn't agree with this point of view. She asserts that feathers have some other functions for different animals. She gives an example of a creature that has a long colorful feathers that uses them for attracting preys. Consequnetly, She believes that dinosaurs who have the white and orange color, employed those for display.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture contradicted the central standpoint of the reading. No evidences of other decomposition in a same excavating place, lack of Beta-carotein in the frills, and using colorful feathers for absorbing preys from the lecture clearly demonstrates that the reading opinion about the excavated fossiles is in doubt.
- all universities students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 70
- The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about cloud seeding relationships with hails. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 90
- all universities students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 70
- Telling the truth 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nces of decomposition in the same cite. In his opinion, these feathers were using ...
^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rotein called Beta-carotein, but frills dont have this material in their structure. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...ir structure. Third, according to the articles opinion, animal uses feathers for flyin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...eir internal temperature. The professor doesnt agree with this point of view. She asse...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 306, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feather'?
Suggestion: feather
... of a creature that has a long colorful feathers that uses them for attracting preys. Co...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.321875 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77139405354 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3180052945 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.176470588 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245274515943 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777696945806 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443504296074 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125673955114 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492292375725 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.