TPO43
The article states that paleontologists believe that there is not enough fossil evidence to detect characteristics of agnostids life, it provides several theories about agnostids lives. On the other hand, the lecture posits that each of theories is weakness and she refutes each of author's reasons.
The reading passage asserts that the agnostids were primative arthropods who swimming dependantly and they hunted smaller marin animals. However, the speaker opposites this point by saying that it is true that arthropodas were free-swimming, but they had large eyes and vision had a key role in this situation. in addition, the agnostids had poor eyed or they were blind and they could not have found their prey. thenc, they could not have been predators.
second, the aurhor believes that the agnostids might have lived on the seefloor becouse of some evidences that arthropods lived in this erea. On the contrary, the speaker claims that most of animals who lived in seefloor sowmming slow and they stay in particular region and they have small geographics, she explain that the agnostids moved fast and go through far distances, which this characteristic can be unutual for animals seefloor dwellers.
Last but not least, in the reading, the author states that the agnostids may have been parasites due to they live on other animals. Nonetheless, the professor states that parasites have a large population and small body, also they kill animals who they are relay on, but the agnostids are large animals in small groups. Then, this animal could not have been parasite.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
- TPO43 80
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? 60
- TPO34 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past becausethey spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networkingWeb site.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It's a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that paleontologists...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ision had a key role in this situation. in addition, the agnostids had poor eyed o...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thenc
...d they could not have found their prey. thenc, they could not have been predators. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... they could not have been predators. second, the aurhor believes that the agnostids...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the animals') or simply say ''most animals''.
Suggestion: most of the animals; most animals
...n the contrary, the speaker claims that most of animals who lived in seefloor sowmming slow and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...on and they have small geographics, she explain that the agnostids moved fast and go th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, then, well, in addition, in particular, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.203125 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63353105921 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3097014187 49.2860985944 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.090909091 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418481311418 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1724484609 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771099090198 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244270380471 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501950910244 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.