Dog Breeding
The passage and the lecturer both are about the effects of dog breeding. The author presents points that show how it contributed to improving the dog breeds and welfare of the dog. The lecturer believes otherwise and gives arguments for each point.
To begin with, the author mentions that the intentional mating of some dogs with special abilities to encourage the same in upcoming generations has helped to improve dog breeds. Dog breeders apply scientific techniques to produce purebred dogs with the required qualities. The lecturer challenges this point by saying that most dog breeders lack the scientific understanding and ethics required to produce fruitful results with new dog breeds. Many of them merely exploit the field for monetary gains. These so-called "backyard breeders" raise the dogs in their backyard and earn money by selling them to unsuspecting people.
Secondly, the author points out that professional breeders love dogs and care about them. Careful selection of dogs to mate leads to better appearance, performance, and health. The lecturer's counterargument to this point is that profit weighs higher than welfare for many breeders. Additionally, the development of purebreds leads to inbreeding, which in turn leads to various genetic disorders in the produced dog breeds. For instance, overuse of a male dog of a certain breed with desired qualities to mate and produce new dog breeds may result in the widespread of genes containing harmful traits. Consequently, the new breeds of dogs might develop problems such as bone issues, heart conditions, and deafness. Similarly, the overpopulation of unwanted dog breeds is due to the proliferation of puppy meals and their advertisement through the media.
Lastly, it is noted in the passage that culture, dog shows and media spur public appreciation of different breeds. These shows and social media educate people about their suitability in terms of various contexts and encourage responsible dog ownership. The lecturer rejects this point and notes that canine clubs and associations add to the genetic diseases of purebreds while killing mix breed dogs in shelters. According to the speaker, popular culture may be counterproductive sometimes. For example, the film 101 Dalmatians resulted in the dogs of that breed being dumped in a shelter after people found out that puppies are not as cute as they are shown in the movie.
To sum up, the author believes that dog breeding has a number of advantages including improved health, welfare, etc. while the lecturer believed that breeding may be dangerous and presents arguments to challenge each point made by the writer.
- Believing or not the newspapers 73
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 78
- Earthworms and its effects on soil plants and animals 78
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 85
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the dog breeds and welfare of the dog. The lecturer believes otherwise and gives a...
^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ppearance, performance, and health. The lecturers counterargument to this point is that p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1373.03311258 164% => OK
No of words: 421.0 270.72406181 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34441805226 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90280914156 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 145.348785872 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529691211401 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8194444228 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.272727273 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535892630101 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173496645037 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126393878838 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339679467296 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760009313772 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 63.6247240618 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the dog breeds and welfare of the dog. The lecturer believes otherwise and gives a...
^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ppearance, performance, and health. The lecturers counterargument to this point is that p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 30.3222958057 204% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1373.03311258 164% => OK
No of words: 421.0 270.72406181 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34441805226 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90280914156 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 145.348785872 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529691211401 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8194444228 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.272727273 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1363636364 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535892630101 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173496645037 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126393878838 0.0662205650399 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339679467296 0.162205337803 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760009313772 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 63.6247240618 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.