The table and chart show the time spent at leisure and household activities in 2008.
The table and bar chart describe how much time male and female spent on recreation and household affairs everyday in 2008.
From the first chart, it is interesting to notice that men spend most time watching TV and video or listening to the radio show, 137 minutes per day, 19 minutes more than women do. In terms of reading, men and women spent almost the same time, 18 minutes and 19 minutes respectively. And obviously, men work out more than women do on an average day.
According to the second graph, it is clear that housewives did more chores than their husbands do per day. Cooking and washing dishes took most of women’s household time, occupied approximately 76 minutes one day. As the traditional arrangement of breadwinning men and homemaking women, housewives take double time to go shopping, do laundry and ironing than men do while as men are more willing to fix and repair.
Overall, men spend more time for entertainment while women spend a greater number of hours doing household. The only possible solution to the housework discrepancy is for everyone to do a lot less of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-20 | Ajith Durai | 67 | view |
| 2016-05-23 | mjdaren | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-29 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Ajith Durai | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open area which in towns and cities than build more housing To what extend do agree or disagree 53
- The charts below show US spending patterns from 1966 to 1996 69
- The diagram shows the stages in the process of bricks are manufactured for the construction industry which can be sketched in seven coherent steps 80
- The line graph shows the sales of children’ books, adult’s fictions and educational books between 2002 and2006 in one country. 80
flaws:
it doesn't need the conclusion paragraph.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 190 200
No. of Characters: 882 1000
No. of Different Words: 112 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.713 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.642 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.603 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.187 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.454 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.693 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.121 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4