In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
This author of the statement claims that in any position, advancement needs debate among people who have contracting point of view with us. While others believe that having a harmony point is considerably vital for triumphing. I agree with this claim. Consider the both views and my point would be delineated.
To begin with, all of us know that contrast situation with my mind would be worthwhile due to several factors like contrast help alternative solution among a tremendous number of opinion. For instance, when some student has a disparate viewpoint and solution for curing cancer, we can combine their comment. Ultimately we can select a great solution without a shadow of doubt.
Nevertheless, as a matter of fact, nature of contrast might lead to struggle or chaos. Besides, this situation might lead to reducing focus and distract us. One of the striking examples for this issue is corresponds to political matter. As we all know that everyone has a distinctive idea in the political discussion. As long as we want to decide based on the different views will bring a considerable uproar without a shadow of doubt.
However, in my view point this topic is highly relatively, progress can occur with a plethora contribution or a modicum of agreement together. In fact, some situation contrast has adverse and improper outcome, while some circumstance, being disparate idea would worthwhile.
By taking into account, we cannot decide which one is better for progress. Nonetheless, based on the investigation this issue is definitely relative owing to different result such as diminishing quality, distract concentrate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Seonghun | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | jessie_llj | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | melavdev | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | jdpatel1107 | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 50
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects." 70
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 80
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sue is corresponds to political matter. As we all know that everyone has a distinc...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ctive idea in the political discussion. As long as we want to decide based on the ...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... being disparate idea would worthwhile. By taking into account, we cannot decide...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26335877863 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93509465047 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6355274821 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1875 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196368299915 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573143310648 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797924654246 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104279929642 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934495607883 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.