statistics on the visits to three different museums from 2000 to 2005.
The bar chart illustrate statistics on the visits to three different museums from 2000 to 2005.
Overall, the MET museum of New York and the National in China increased their visitor numbers over the period, whereas Edo-Tokyo followed a decreasing trend.
Firstly, the strongest growth was the one of the National museum in China. In 2000, its visitors were just over 6 millions, but over the years they raised almost steadily. Despite remaining constant at 11 in 2003 and 2004, they reached the maximum value in the graph at nearly 16 millions.
Secondly, MET and Edo-Tokyo numbers were more erratic during the years. While the former reported a raise of more than 2 millions over the 5 years, the latter lost almost 4 millions of visitors. MET went down from 12 millions to half that number during 2001 and remained constant at this value in 2002 before rising to more than 14 millions. Conversely, Edo Tokio had the highest frequencies of visits during both 2000 and 2001 but then slipped to approximatively 6 millions in 2003, reaching 10 millions in 2005.
- It is pontless making children who lack artistic talent learn painting and drawing in Art classes at school Instead they should concentrate on other creative or practical subjects for which they may have more aptitude To what extent do you agree or disagr 33
- statistics on the visits to three different museums from 2000 to 2005. 48
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live or study abroad 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...ver the 5 years, the latter lost almost 4 millions of visitors. MET went down from 12 million...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'then', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235 0.268076937826 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.095 0.116061578633 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.05 0.0759168565197 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.06 0.0366838410393 164% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02 0.0131127313244 153% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16 0.155750635184 103% => OK
Participles: 0.02 0.0379272487307 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5377465406 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025 0.0210936926555 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.105 0.0948980150116 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1067.0 1161.00487805 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.9 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89502762431 5.90752243213 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370165745856 0.337110787985 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254143646409 0.247514529752 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187845303867 0.171178102325 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0994475138122 0.112407865282 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5377465406 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624309392265 0.546246751206 114% => OK
Word variations: 59.9249560134 49.3433353143 121% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1111111111 23.0094962315 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7807016278 42.9750493124 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.555555556 135.714022679 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 23.0094962315 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.689975730869 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 45.525475752 47.7609492067 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.37142857143 2.94281807926 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331520962007 0.418131533498 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149651439413 0.181151798455 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0852592238711 0.0850326197045 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.681238635325 0.706616315825 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185257703711 0.157042692854 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176869618915 0.228904883108 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.237006496832 0.108899403657 218% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.30576065343 0.367819155151 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.119627752411 0.0812612215331 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304744261362 0.316326947829 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.310229368388 0.0921553760075 337% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.