As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
From mobile gadgets to internet-based services, humans have become more dependent upon technology than ever before. Although the technology never ceases to make our life more convenient, and we tend to liberate our brains with the chore of memorizing or calculating, it is unreasonable to assume our ability to solve problems, to philosophize and to create would necessarily be endangered as a result of technological advancement.
With the development of technology, our brains inevitably become less trained in low-level tasks such as calculation or memorization. The once-mandatory ability to read a map has been replaced by the use of highly accessible GPS. Just like how the ability to judge directions from the stars at night used to be critical for survival, but now has become little more than a peripheral life hack. While some may argue this harms our ability to think for ourselves, I think liberating our minds from the tiring daily low-level functions exactly enhances our ability to think about other more involved ideas. For example, Einstein does not bother with remembering the numerous speed of light, since it could be find anywhere, and frees his brain for the more demanding job of revolutionize the field of physics. The invention of virtual composing software such as garage band made the creation of music an accessible job for more aspiring musicians who may not be able to afford a whole set of musical instruments before. As technologies become more widespread and take care of the low level thinking for us, more brilliant minds could be emancipated and thence able to focus on more interesting thinking.
Moreover, the worry that our brain would run out of challenges to solve is unwarranted. Although technology has solved myriads problems in the world, humans are never content that the current life is perfect enough. The development of technology empowers human to envision better things to life, and to further advance the capability of technology. For example, without the invention of internet, no one would have dared to imagine the existence of a social network that spans the globe, connecting like-minded individuals from different continents in no time. The creation of Facebook then uncover some other ethical and philosophical debates regarding privacy, social boundaries and censorship. We cannot take it for granted how much technology has expanded our life's possibilities, providing more challenges than ever before for us to ponder upon.
For the reasons stated above, although the dependence on technology will likely deteriorate our ability to perform low level computations and information storage, it ultimately liberates our mind for higher thinking, philosophizing and creating, rather than endangers its ability for these wonderful things
- Some people believe that in order to thrive a society must put its own overall success before the well being of its individual citizens Others believe that the well being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people 71
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 58
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 58
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 84
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...t our brain would run out of challenges to solve is unwarranted. Although technology has...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for example', 'i think', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225469728601 0.240241500013 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.160751565762 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108559498956 0.0880659088768 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0688935281837 0.0497285424764 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0480167014614 0.0444667217837 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133611691023 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0480167014614 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00108451472 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0438413361169 0.030933414821 142% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0772442588727 0.0997080785238 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0187891440501 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00835073068894 0.0148568991511 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2799.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 440.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36136363636 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395454545455 0.366273622748 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309090909091 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240909090909 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184090909091 0.132149295362 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00108451472 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 219.290929204 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577272727273 0.48968727796 118% => OK
Word variations: 70.4296587294 55.4138127331 127% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5 23.380412469 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7089336471 59.4972553346 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.9375 141.124799967 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.380412469 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.674092028746 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 58.4090909091 51.4728631049 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.46616541353 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.481670291621 0.391690518653 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103123706941 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0592029638481 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542287335331 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172491433122 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20139222219 0.161403998019 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678902924004 0.0892212321368 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384897528542 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0944586349536 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342379627496 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616650385594 0.0653680567796 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.