In many countries, government spends money to improve the internet access?
Why is this happening?
Is it appropriate that government spend money on this?
There are an increasing number of people who are using the internet as part of everyday’s life. In some countries, technological advances such as the internet have been funded by the government. I believe that global competition is a valid argument for the government to pour resources into this and it is beneficial to the country as a whole.
To begin with, globalization is a primary reason for the government to allocate funds in strengthening the internet access. As most countries economy is reliant to a worldwide integration of trade and business, the competition to be connected with different countries using the internet post a greater challenge. Funding this will lead to a better communication between other nations. For instance, in a business forum held in Brisbane Australia, the majority of the members of the international business group agreed that a faster connection on the internet will yield to a better growth in the business and the economy. Thus, it makes it clear that the cost of funding is justified.
Furthermore, the money that the government spent on improving internet connection will be return back to the government resources through tax payment. The growth of the economy will bring enormous business in the country, therefore more tax collection will be expected to come from business and employment. This will enable the government to allocate more funds in the health, education, and infrastructure that will benefit all the members of society. For example, Singapore has been voted in ASEAN as the most livable country in Asia because of its development in technology alongside with other government benefits that everyone is receiving.
In conclusion, although the government has a priority expenditure such as health and education, I believe that it is also worthwhile to invest in the technology that will benefit us all.
- The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of modern life Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 65
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports or music, and others are not. However, it is claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both views and give your 67
- In many countries, government spends money to improve the internet access?Why is this happening?Is it appropriate that government spend money on this? 91
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sports or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both views and 67
- The table gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e who are using the internet as part of everyday’s life. In some countries, technologica...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...engthening the internet access. As most countries economy is reliant to a worldwide integ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...n improving internet connection will be return back to the government resources through tax...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269113149847 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.14373088685 0.155533422707 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0825688073394 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0214067278287 0.0501214627716 43% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0244648318043 0.0437548338989 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149847094801 0.122226691241 123% => OK
Participles: 0.039755351682 0.0403226058552 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.07212519658 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0366972477064 0.0326793684256 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134556574924 0.0861772015684 156% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244648318043 0.021408717616 114% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00917431192661 0.011925033212 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1879.0 1933.35771543 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 316.048096192 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24252491694 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388704318937 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335548172757 0.28420135186 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.265780730897 0.203846283523 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169435215947 0.137316102897 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07212519658 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504983388704 0.56093040696 90% => OK
Word variations: 50.4720514409 60.7387585426 83% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1538461538 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6781356309 49.517814964 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.538461538 127.492653851 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7743622355 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 56.7086634296 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.41935483871 1.69124875643 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381085840586 0.332605444948 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139218038625 0.102741220458 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.076020949835 0.0668466124924 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.609525094791 0.534860350844 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175831145718 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182557343845 0.134430193775 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767185466308 0.0742795772207 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.52889203285 0.324371583561 163% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0731785288112 0.0638462369009 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282774172301 0.228012699653 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315598599678 0.058150111329 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.