tpo5
The reading and the lecture are both about massive stone buildings that have many rooms and three or four houses. The author of the reading believes that there are three possible reasons for using these buildings but the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the lecture. He thinks that all reason that alluded in reading are not convincing.
First of all, the author claims that these buildings are used for living and many numbers of people lived there. This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that residential place needs many fire places for daily cooking, but there was only fire place for ten families there. Also there was not enough room for that people for living.
Secondly, the author states that these buildings are used for storing food. He argues that maintain grain mazie there for a long period of time. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. He suggests that they do not discover any evidence in excavation for storing food.
Finally, the author mentions that they use these houses as the ceremonial center. He is of the opinion that archeologists found a mound that contains many puts in it. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that it is not true. He [puts forth the idea that in this mound there is a lot of material of sand, stone and other buildings materials, so this place was not a ceremonial center. Furthermore there is not good evidence for using this place for special ceremony.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
- replacement for the automobile's engine source of power 86
- living 60
- tpo 9 86
- chance to alter one important thing about my hometown 63
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement?people today spend too much time in personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...only fire place for ten families there. Also there was not enough room for that peop...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...t maintain grain mazie there for a long period of time. This argument is rebutted by the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...her hand, feels that it is not true. He [puts forth the idea that in this mound t...
^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...this place was not a ceremonial center. Furthermore there is not good evidence for using th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247272727273 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.163636363636 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0727272727273 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0545454545455 0.0435111971325 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0363636363636 0.0277247811725 131% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152727272727 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.04 0.0370669169778 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.24791814798 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0 0.0208969081088 0% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123636363636 0.128158765124 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0109090909091 0.0114777025283 95% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1433.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 271.125827815 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.732 6.08160592843 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.284 0.374372842146 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.208 0.287516216867 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.14 0.187439937562 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.064 0.113142543107 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24791814798 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.1846690104 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.625 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.569419362 49.3711431718 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5625 132.220823453 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 21.7502111507 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.878197800319 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 36.425 50.5018328374 72% => OK
Elegance: 1.72857142857 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116676923012 0.142949733639 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0890749435791 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534522708435 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158591999833 0.139662658121 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.376215750839 0.414875509568 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0279008071193 0.0530846634433 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.