Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Sport is very popular among a great majority of the people. While for some people playing sports represents only a free time activity, for other it is their job. Mostly over the last period of time, a successful sportsperson has earned huge amounts of money. There is no doubt that famous sports professionals are among the richest people in the world. However, some claim that it is not fair that persons working in other highly regarded fields do not earn as much money as the sportspersons.
First of all, ordinary people should be aware of the fact that most sportsmen have dedicated their time towards building up a successful professional career since they were little kids. They did not truly know what a childhood supposed. From an early age, their schedule has been drastic, consisting of harsh training sessions, many physical exercises in order to improve their physical fitness and endurance, and a certain nutrition. Therefore, a sportsperson does not have a high salary by doing nothing. He or she has spent countless hours working both physically and mentally so as to be as successful as they are. Furthermore, many sports professionals earn twice as much from endorsements , compared to their salary. For example, Roger Federer endorses the products of popular companies, such as Nike, Mercedes-Benz or Rolex.
On the other hand, it is explainable that some people feel they should earn higher amounts of money, given the fact their professions are also deemed important. Sports events benefit from a lot of media coverage and this might be a drawback for other professions. For instance, people do not know that there are so many brilliant doctors saving lives each day, because they do not see them on TV or on the Internet. Also, companies usually look for celebrities, such as sportspersons, because ordinary people are interested in their lives and they feel enticed to buy the products that famous people endorse.
To conclude, I strongly believe that successful sports professionals deserve the large sums they earn because they have been constantly working hardly to attain the highest level in their careers. Yet, I also think that people in other important professions should get more credit for what they do and consequently higher salaries.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- Many people regard film as less important art forms than literature and paintings. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 87
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far out weight the disadvantages Do you agree or disagree 42
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 92
- Many parents think that it is good to help children in their homework, but others think parents should not do that and it is their own duty. Discuss both and give your opinion. 73
- A lot of people believe that the amount of violence shown on TV and in the cinema affects the actions of our young people and therefore increases the amount of violence in our society today Do you agree or disagree 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r it is their job. Mostly over the last period of time, a successful sportsperson has earned h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rs working both physically and mentally so as to be as successful as they are. Furthermo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 695, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...als earn twice as much from endorsements , compared to their salary. For example, ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'no doubt', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224637681159 0.247107183377 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.159420289855 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.125603864734 0.0946595960268 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0676328502415 0.0501214627716 135% => OK
Pronouns: 0.06038647343 0.0437548338989 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.123188405797 0.122226691241 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0403226058552 108% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75835413682 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0144927536232 0.0326793684256 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0024154589372 0.00163938923432 147% => OK
Determiners: 0.0772946859903 0.0861772015684 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00966183574879 0.021408717616 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00724637681159 0.011925033212 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2276.0 1933.35771543 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 316.048096192 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08556149733 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358288770053 0.374742101984 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256684491979 0.28420135186 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18449197861 0.203846283523 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122994652406 0.137316102897 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75835413682 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.037074148 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 63.227799395 60.7387585426 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7777777778 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5564024312 49.517814964 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 127.492653851 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.7743622355 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.814263465372 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 46.4462269756 49.1944974215 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.36134453782 1.69124875643 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251619231189 0.332605444948 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0665896255507 0.102741220458 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0550297086886 0.0668466124924 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.451420827807 0.534860350844 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136609950388 0.148594505496 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941824992261 0.134430193775 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656180798038 0.0742795772207 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297412352858 0.324371583561 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0462124453539 0.0638462369009 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17727463551 0.228012699653 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604646767463 0.058150111329 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.68436873747 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.