Co2 emissions in between 1967 and 2007.
The Line Chart compares carbon dioxide emission by per person in four main regions, over a time course of 40 years, since 1957, measured in metric tonnes.
Over the period as a whole, the carbon dioxide emission rose abruptly in Italy and Portugal whereas a significant fall was noticed in UK and Sweden, at the end of the year 2007.
In detail, in the year 1967, the Co2 emission by the UK was at the peak, as emission ratio individually per person was roughly 11 metric tonnes. Meanwhile, the Co2 emission in Sweden was doubled than that of emitted by Italy, in the same year. Portugal was not a significant contributor to the emissions, as only 1.8 metric tonnes Co2 emitted individually. After next 2 decades, in the year 1987, the same trend of Co2 emission was analysed in Italy and Portugal. In both of these regions, nearly 30% Co2 emission was increased and ended at 6.4 metric tonnes and 2.6 metric tonnes, respectively. However, the Co2 emission by Swedish people - which showed a dramatic fall in the case of emission of Co2 in Sweden, with minor elevation in the year 1977 -converged at this time with Italian emission.
At the end of the year 2007, as the Co2 emission ratio in UK and Sweden diminished with compared to previous years, ended at 8.5 metric tonnes and 5.2 metric tonnes, respectively. In contrast, the Portugal emissions ratio - in spite of the steeple rising in the Co2 emission - was the same as in Sweden. However, with a noticeable rise, the Co2 emission per person in Italy ended at 7.8 metric tonnes.
- The traditional life style of local people in developing countries is attracting and increasing the number of tourists to the countries which has the effect of preventing local people changing to modern ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- Transportation mode covered by per person annually in England in between 1985 and 2000. 84
- The tabular graph compares usage of rail transport system in 2007. 73
- Nowadays business face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack of some interpersonal skills such and work in a team what do u think what are the cause of this how can it be resolved 91
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.298701298701 0.268076937826 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.0876623376623 0.116061578633 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0681818181818 0.0759168565197 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.038961038961 0.0366838410393 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.185064935065 0.155750635184 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0292207792208 0.0379272487307 77% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56106046646 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00649350649351 0.0210936926555 31% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113636363636 0.0948980150116 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00324675324675 0.00967000014798 34% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1545.0 1161.00487805 133% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.9 139% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65934065934 5.90752243213 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73763899035 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340659340659 0.337110787985 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238095238095 0.247514529752 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164835164835 0.171178102325 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0659340659341 0.112407865282 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56106046646 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435897435897 0.546246751206 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.6353773045 49.3433353143 82% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8181818182 23.0094962315 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5751285358 42.9750493124 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.454545455 135.714022679 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 23.0094962315 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.689975730869 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 48.6277056277 47.7609492067 102% => OK
Elegance: 4.05128205128 2.94281807926 138% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255333891823 0.418131533498 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.213802987785 0.181151798455 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0719388786834 0.0850326197045 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.730477046739 0.706616315825 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172519382766 0.157042692854 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149287195146 0.228904883108 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385215579912 0.108899403657 35% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.525218532256 0.367819155151 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.231354003529 0.0812612215331 285% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178561131392 0.316326947829 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648939641579 0.0921553760075 70% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.