The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar graph elucidates how many travelers using three distinguish airports in New York City from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, the number of travelers using LaGuardia and Newark rose substantially despite the fact that, LaGuardia was received the highest number of travelers for most of periods, whereas John F. Kennedy airport experienced a periodic fluctuation.
Firstly, LaGuardia had the dominant travelers of about 35 million of passengers. Meanwhile, John F. Kennedy was the second highest traveler received with just above 25 million of passengers and only 15 million travelers used Newark airports.
Then, by 1997, the number of passengers using John F Kennedy rose to close to 50 million travelers, whilst LaGuardia and Newark had risen stably so that it reached at just over 40 million and just under 40 million of passengers, respectively.
After 1997 till the end of the projected period, notably, La Guardia airport recorded the highest traveler usages where it reached a peak at nearly 70 million passengers in 2000.
In contrast, the number of travelers using Newark had remained unchanged at around 41 million travelers. Conversely, the number of travelers using John F. Kennedy airport rose constantly to reach at approximately 45 million passengers by 2000, although there was a periodic drop in its passenger of just over 30 million passengers in 1999.
- The table shows source of student income over a five-year period in the United States. Write a report for a college lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 73
- The table below shows the results of a survey on workplace complaints in Germany in 2001. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the periods') or simply say ''most periods''.
Suggestion: most of the periods; most periods
...ved the highest number of travelers for most of periods, whereas John F. Kennedy airport experi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'firstly', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275 0.268076937826 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.108333333333 0.116061578633 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0541666666667 0.0759168565197 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0708333333333 0.0366838410393 193% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0125 0.0131127313244 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.158333333333 0.155750635184 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0375 0.0379272487307 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84711656262 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0166666666667 0.0210936926555 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0625 0.0948980150116 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00833333333333 0.00967000014798 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1372.0 1161.00487805 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.9 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29357798165 5.90752243213 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417431192661 0.337110787985 124% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.348623853211 0.247514529752 141% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.229357798165 0.171178102325 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160550458716 0.112407865282 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84711656262 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.546246751206 99% => OK
Word variations: 49.8779229894 49.3433353143 101% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 27.25 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3977914273 42.9750493124 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.5 135.714022679 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 23.0094962315 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 0.689975730869 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.84146341463 156% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 62.1123853211 47.7609492067 130% => OK
Elegance: 2.45652173913 2.94281807926 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331936757879 0.418131533498 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182997798197 0.181151798455 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0695370775644 0.0850326197045 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.880428724901 0.706616315825 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137695494205 0.157042692854 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194953727548 0.228904883108 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784684000098 0.108899403657 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267204203418 0.367819155151 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111107789791 0.0812612215331 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219614671025 0.316326947829 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079438908293 0.0921553760075 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.