Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs
The business manager of the television station thinks that devoting more time to national news and less time to local news and weather has led to complaints from viewers, and has also led to a loss of advertising revenues. The managers contention is rife with loopholes. We are not even been provided with sufficient evidences to agree with the manager conclusion.
He tells us that there have been complaints from the viewers concerning to coverage of weather and local news. But the exact nature of complaints is not mentioned. Maybe, the information about weather or the local news they are presenting is not accurate. This can be the trigger for discontent amongst the viewers and not just the time that is alloted to the local news or weather.
We are also told that the local businesses who used to advertise have cancelled their advertising contracts without mentioning any reason behind it. Maybe the local businesses have had their own losses pertaining to which they have cut down on their advertising expenses. Maybe they find the channel's advertising costs too high. Or since the news are programmed late night, the advertisers might have thought that their might not be substantial number of viewers watching it. So the timing of the news could also be the reason behind its decision.
Futher the manager thinks that restoring the time devoted to weather and local news will help it in attracting the viewers. Also it would avoid losing any further advertising revenues. Maybe they need to focus on improving the content of the news. The manager should also consider other cases which might help to handle the situation in a better way.There can be reasons besides these to address the issue.
The manager would have made the argument more pursuasive by telling us about the nature of complaints. Also, knowing the reason behind the cancellation of the advertising contract would have helped us to conclude better. An investigation about any other ways of approaching the problem should also have been considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | yirtusemla | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | riyarmy | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 16
- Strong beliefs prevent people from thinking clearly about issues 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
... to a loss of advertising revenues. The managers contention is rife with loopholes. We a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to agree with the manager conclusion. He tells us that there have been complai...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alloted to the local news or weather. We are also told that the local business...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso be the reason behind its decision. Futher the manager thinks that restoring...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...will help it in attracting the viewers. Also it would avoid losing any further adver...
^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...to handle the situation in a better way.There can be reasons besides these to address...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s besides these to address the issue. The manager would have made the argument...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.25644967241 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.194444444444 0.15541462614 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0836205057962 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.0520304965353 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0527777777778 0.0272364105082 194% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.102777777778 0.125424944231 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0861111111111 0.0416121511921 207% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.62887246234 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0388888888889 0.026700313972 146% => OK
Particles: 0.00277777777778 0.001811407834 153% => OK
Determiners: 0.119444444444 0.113004496875 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0333333333333 0.0255425247493 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138888888889 0.0127820249294 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2050.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 337.0 446.07635468 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08308605341 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33234421365 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26409495549 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181008902077 0.208842608468 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13649851632 0.135150697306 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62887246234 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 207.018472906 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495548961424 0.469332199767 106% => OK
Word variations: 51.1013468525 52.1807786196 98% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7368421053 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0498004474 57.7814097925 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.894736842 141.986410481 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 23.2022227129 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.315789473684 0.724660767414 44% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.58251231527 195% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 44.1463376542 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.35779816514 1.8405768891 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464849131559 0.441005458295 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126650661621 0.135418324435 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0834857955818 0.0829849096947 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585792019526 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155914536292 0.147661913831 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191777119286 0.193483328276 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124904556741 0.0970749176394 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.441631072642 0.42659136922 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0118470030977 0.0774707102158 15% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334807866921 0.312017818177 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108808781257 0.0698173142475 156% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.