Governments should place few, if any , restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research and development even though beneficial to human beings one cannot deny the destructive ability it possess. So placing few restrictions on scientific developments is agreeable.
Firstly, one cannot question the fact Scientific developments have transformed our lives but at the same time there are many scientific developments which had caused destruction in large scale. For example the infamous Hiroshima and Nagasaki incident during second world war was as a result of scientific development of Nuclear bombs.These kind of research and developments needs restrictions.
Furthermore, medical industry has seen a vast scientific research growth leading in curing severe diseases but the same medical research can be used in creating viruses which can be used in destroying human existence. The popular embryonic stem cell research had triggered a controversy whether human embryos can be destroyed for curing the diseases. and it remains till date as an ethical controversy and several governments has but restriction on its research.
Regulations are required to be in place in controlling these kind of research and developments only then people will be able to live peacefully.
In conclusion, few restrictions need to be placed on scientific researches and also scientists should follow ethical principles and work towards research which will be beneficial to living organisms and also to our environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 75
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 50
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'possesses'?
Suggestion: possesses
... cannot deny the destructive ability it possess. So placing few restrictions on scienti...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...scientific development of Nuclear bombs.These kind of research and developments needs...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...scientific development of Nuclear bombs.These kind of research and developments needs rest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...n be destroyed for curing the diseases. and it remains till date as an ethical cont...
^^^
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... required to be in place in controlling these kind of research and developments only then ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275109170306 0.240241500013 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.170305676856 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.139737991266 0.0880659088768 159% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0524017467249 0.0497285424764 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0218340611354 0.0444667217837 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0960698689956 0.12292977631 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0742358078603 0.0406280797675 183% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.19299530806 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0262008733624 0.030933414821 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0524017467249 0.0997080785238 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0349344978166 0.0249443105267 140% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0131004366812 0.0148568991511 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1441.0 2732.02544248 53% => OK
No of words: 215.0 452.878318584 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.7023255814 6.0361032391 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.58838876751 83% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.451162790698 0.366273622748 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.367441860465 0.280924506359 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.293023255814 0.200843997647 146% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.213953488372 0.132149295362 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19299530806 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 219.290929204 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609302325581 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 60.8642073512 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6194690265 44% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 23.8888888889 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8024496347 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.111111111 141.124799967 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 0.674092028746 214% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 60.6330749354 51.4728631049 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.82142857143 1.64882698954 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302501357455 0.391690518653 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114367846473 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0946786903395 0.077325440228 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.695737969189 0.547984918172 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192735934834 0.149214159877 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138585313276 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758917713843 0.0892212321368 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.225213437441 0.385218514788 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0485671960092 0.0692045440612 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179683102542 0.275328986314 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707610879225 0.0653680567796 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.