The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The author in the issue talks about the greatness of the person. I would like to state that I am in a complete disagreement with what author says. There are multiple reasons for disagreement with author’s view. I will try to enable my views in the succeeding paragraphs.
Primarily, I see many loopholes with what the author suggests. He says that any person’s greatness can be decided by those who live after them and not by who live with them or not by their contemporaries & I completely not agreed with it. Moreover there are various other reasons which prompt my disagreement with author. Author says that greatness of the person can be decided by after his death, in some situation may be it is correct but we can’t say that it is perfectly true for all the situation. As, my point of view in some situation the effect of man‘s actions may be seen by years after his death. Charles Darwin, the great biologist-scientist gives theory of evolution but people at his time can’t accept his theories but after his death he is famous for his theories. Now he is consider as a great scientist. We can also take the example of Galileo, Kepler all stood by the theory that earth is not at the center of the universe but their theory can not accepted by their contemporaries. Today we all know that earth is not the center of the universe.
In contrary, if we consider any artists or writer their work is appreciated by their contemporaries. Writer like Shakespeare was appreciated by their contemporaries and their good work is also appreciated by those who live after them. So their greatness can be appreciated by both who live after them and who lives with them. Painter and musicians are also appreciated by their contemporaries. Even today, Shakespeare and all that artists are accepted as a great people due to their work centuries ago.
To wrap up my discussion over this issue, I once again exemplify as I have done in the previous paragraphs. After all, life has many options, we take some and abandon some. So after more study about this issue it is clearly conclude that it is not necessary that the greatness of the individuals can also be decided by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Dipper | 50 | view |
- "Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many s 50
- Is it better for children to learn to read by using the online material or by using printed material? 56
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished quot 75
- "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes rema 50
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...by those who live after them and not by who live with them or not by their contempo...
^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with them or not by their contemporaries I completely not agreed with it. Moreove...
^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ries I completely not agreed with it. Moreover there are various other reasons which p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...d by after his death, in some situation may be it is correct but we can't say tha...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 811, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...e is famous for his theories. Now he is consider as a great scientist. We can also take ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 987, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'accept'
Suggestion: accept
...f the universe but their theory can not accepted by their contemporaries. Today we all k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 225, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'concluded'.
Suggestion: concluded
...re study about this issue it is clearly conclude that it is not necessary that the great...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'after all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.211711711712 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.148648648649 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0472972972973 0.0880659088768 54% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0495495495495 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.108108108108 0.0444667217837 243% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.155405405405 0.12292977631 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0315315315315 0.0406280797675 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84087936829 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00900900900901 0.030933414821 29% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00225225225225 0.0016655270985 135% => OK
Determiners: 0.0855855855856 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027027027027 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202702702703 0.0148568991511 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2255.0 2732.02544248 83% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75255102041 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.270408163265 0.366273622748 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.206632653061 0.280924506359 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160714285714 0.200843997647 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127551020408 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84087936829 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441326530612 0.48968727796 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.5125546212 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3384810699 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.380952381 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 39.3299319728 51.4728631049 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.30147058824 1.64882698954 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532454881582 0.391690518653 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164094082207 0.123202303941 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.161544350424 0.077325440228 209% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.482021431694 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166219289718 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172562931923 0.161403998019 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181218990175 0.0892212321368 203% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.290558614508 0.385218514788 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.030196179019 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340859834027 0.275328986314 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142810694496 0.0653680567796 218% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.