It is necessary to be competitive in order to succeed in life.
Rivalry is a basic factor of progress. I strongly agree with the statement that competition cause the creativity, self-improvement and prevent from the degradation.
First, contest stimulates people to be more creative. Nowadays, creativity is a significant pathway to the development. For instance, a lot of universities suggest grants for some new ideas or innovations every year. Young students and scholars who are interested in unpaid education or in finance donations can try in research project. Besides, research requires not as hard working process but mostly creative thoughts and ideas. Consequently, innovations that have been provided for the reason to win a grant trigger the development in some area of science as well. Thus, competition can evoke the invention of novelistic ideas and lead to success.
Secondly, rivalry is the best stimulation method for constant self-development. Based on human nature to “win”, competition lead to the review and enhancing own capabilities to go beyond the others. This can be obviously seen on the further example. So, the globalization and modern economy are based on free contest. The reason lies on a fact that companies’ zeal aspiration to sell more products causes the improvements of the production. It is obviously leads to the regular research and progress. Thus, it is a win-win situation for the company and for consumers. By this example it is proved the importance of the contest to the development.
On the other hand, some may opine the idea that success can hardly depend upon a struggle or a competition. However, this argument does not take under the consideration that an absence of contest can lead to stagnation of development. For example, one of the primary factors that caused the dissolution of the Soviet Union was its backward economy system based on absolute absence of rivalry. This depressed the motivation of companies to make research or improve the production. The result was a big gap between the economy of European countries and the Soviet Union. Therefore, competition is a very highly required indicator of the progress.
To sum up, a rivalry is not only an efficient instrument of success, but also inevitable factor against the degradation or stagnation of the development of as well as society or the person simultaneously.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-28 | Noma Ahmad | 50 | view |
2016-11-07 | Madridista | 56 | view |
- Because of research priorities at the national and academic levels, we know more about the surface of the moon than we do about the ocean floor of our own planet, despite the central role the oceans play in global transportation, food production, and clim 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 16
- . 67
- If rituals did not exist, we would have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves socially and culturally. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lf development. Based on human nature to apos;win apos;, competition lead to the ...
^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...ar research and progress. Thus, it is a win win situation for the company and for consu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 12.9106741573 279% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20159151194 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06102634586 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7375577361 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7083333333 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7083333333 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0607267213654 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185172388361 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326398237766 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0341591656159 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199826651284 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Is it a correct essay topic?
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.