Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise
They must have well-defined principles and objectives in order to support their stand. Their objectives must be concerned towards the welfare of the people. Political leaders in a nation should be enforced constant regulations except in special conditions that it would be changed. Political leaders must be adhered to a cause to prevent from chaos and it cannot damage the frame of the society. So adherence to some fixed rules can help the progresses of a nation and create trust in a nation to the political leaders.
It might be true that, changing some rules by political leaders according to people's opinion for the sake of compromise and for restoring order is necessary and even is beneficial for the durability of a nation. It would helped people to discern his real character and be the witness of political leader's respect. It could be denied that, remain consistently to special ideas may damage to the society of a nation so, changes in rules by political leaders who listen to people's idea may be associated with growth of the nation. Sometimes public opinions can effect on a leader's principle due to difficulties which are tolerated by them. For instance, Abraham Lincoln is a prominent person in history who abolished slavery, strengthened the federal government, and modernized the economy.
Nevertheless, if a political leader leads the desire of people, then he will least likely to be considered as an exemplary person. People will be doubted to his morality and in this situation he will turn out to be the most hated person in a nation. So, sticking to a particular cause forced the society to acclaim them and will bold their positive role in the society. Firstly, political leaders for achieving to a stable society, should be stable in their principals and ideas. Ample courage must be existed in their essence. For instance, Hitler who is promoted Nazism and Mussolini who is promoted fascism are the most prominent persons who achieved to their goals with violence and war. It was while, Mahatma Gandhi didn't utilize any violence in his leadership.
Furthermore, sticking to a particular cause can effect on people's belief and their opinions too. It would be caused that, peoples feeling peace in the society and rely on the decisions that are taken by these political leaders. Moreover, tenacious political leader in the regulation of rules without any attention to the people's opinion are more acclaimed by people who are living in a nation.
As a result, An efficient leader in every society is discerned by his principles and objectives. Tenacious in leadership creates a clear picture of the leader and engenders trust on him.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | liakath96 | 50 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | zeus_helene_leda | 50 | view |
| 2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 50 | view |
| 2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 54 | view |
- Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise 50
- "It is often asserted that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. In reality, however, formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free." 58
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- "The best way to teach-whether as an educator, employer, or parent-is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones." 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...rules by political leaders according to peoples opinion for the sake of compromise and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...or the durability of a nation. It would helped people to discern his real character an...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e witness of political leaders respect. It could be denied that, remain consistent...
^^
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ules by political leaders who listen to peoples idea may be associated with growth of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...metimes public opinions can effect on a leaders principle due to difficulties which are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e and war. It was while, Mahatma Gandhi didnt utilize any violence in his leadership....
^^^^^
Line 4, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...n of rules without any attention to the peoples opinion are more acclaimed by people wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and objectives. Tenacious in leadership creates a clear picture of the leader an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01354401806 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75484017745 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474040632054 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3743075575 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.954545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186983017017 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630669051236 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490617673028 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112178428509 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425330887613 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.