Hours of leisure time per year in Someland
The table gives information about the hours of leisure time that different age groups spent on 6 various activities per year in Someland.
Overall, it can be seen that teenagers had much more leisure time in a year than others. The 30s aged people were the busiest ones, whereas the older people had enough free time to watch TV and videos.
The people from all age groups preferred to spent their leisure time on watching TV, the teenagers and 70s+ age citizens were leaders in this category with 1200, 1100 hours per year, respectively. Although the humans whose age was 30s and 40s, spent nearly 300 hours per year to socializing with 4 or less people, their interest were less in cinema which was accounted for 50 and 25 hours.
In terms of group exercise and sport, the elderly people were not involved definitely that is indicated with 0. The individual exercise figures indicated 4 times greater than socializing with 4 or more people for 30s aged people. In addition, the socializing with 4 or more people showed the lowest figures among other categories and for olds it stands at 25hours compared to 350 hours for teens.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-09 | thadsha1999 | 73 | view |
2022-03-04 | priyal | 67 | view |
2021-02-27 | Abhishek2113 | 78 | view |
2020-10-19 | Marywonderlaw | 61 | view |
2019-05-09 | Harrykaur | 56 | view |
- Hours of leisure time per year in Someland 85
- Main reasons for migration to from the UK 2007 73
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 72
- The table below the housing, house prices and income trends in the city of Newby from 1995-2005. There are concerns about the shortage of affordable housing in the areas as a result of increased house prices and a lack of cheaper accommodation available t 80
- UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...hours per year to socializing with 4 or less people, their interest were less in cin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7614213198 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4094196176 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7208082496 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321521220421 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154455067183 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14956626676 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238910464108 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157565231267 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.