Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree?
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic dilemmas. Indeed, it is the truth that traditional newspapers will be continued as a major source for using of people in the future. Although newspaper is beneficial to some extents, I totally refute with the statement.
First and foremost, there are several reasons why people are less interested in reading newspaper because it is not suitable for the digital age. Firstly, the traditional newspaper does not compete effectively with the electronic newspaper, which is a modern product that is equipped with a hardware in which it can store a large amount of information. As a result of this, conventional newspaper becomes fewer convenience if I have a demand to read and bring it far lung of my home on each my trip. Secondly, the conventional newspaper could not up to date instantly information at any time of the day, while internet’s newspaper could produce hourly every burning issue to the customers. One particularly good example for this is that an accidental fire happens far distance from my location would take me one day to get the news because of the daily production of the newspapers.
Additionally, the production from traditional newspaper plays a main source that pollutes and causes a serious harm to the environment. With regard to the former, used newspaper could be disposal to the environment system in order to waste not only the natural materials but also the expenditure of the workforce to tackle this issue. To be more specific, producing newspaper has demanded a large amount of manpower in a various procedure of processing system. I addition to this convention newspaper is made by wooden raw- materials, which is produced by logging the wild forest. As a consequence, the deforestation damages significantly the health of the natural world. Therefore, the less using traditional newspaper would be a popular habit for people in the future.
In conclusion, while newspaper will play a main role in the future, I would argue that I disagree with the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | catngan | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | catngan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 84 | view |
- Some people prefer to work for the large company, while others prefer to work for the small company. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people prefer to work for the large company, while others prefer to work for the small company. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- Some people prefer to work for the large company, while others prefer to work for the small company. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lifestyles'' or 'lifestyle's'?
Suggestion: lifestyles'; lifestyle's
With the proliferation of contemporary lifestyles comes a wide range of socio-economic di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I totally refute with the statement. First and foremost, there are several re...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he daily production of the newspapers. Additionally, the production from tra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14076246334 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11189158676 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0702716071 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182548009283 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580964808085 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377298547153 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109064412493 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00851378762423 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.