The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables demonstrate the profit made by selling Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in two different years. Overall, it is evident that sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in Switzerland and UK in 2004 were significantly higher than those in 1999. Otherwise, in Denmark, Belgium and Sweden, the numbers stayed steady and didn't make any notably changes.
In 1999, sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in UK stood at 1.5 millions of Euros. Five years later, this number rose over 1300%. At the same timeframe, sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas also increased over 500%.
Meanwhile , Switzerland was the largest market for the fairtrade-labelled banana sales with 15 million Euros sold in 1999 which was higher than the combined sales in other four countries. The sales amount of bananas reached to 47 million Euros in 2004 which was more than three times higher than that of 1999 and the second largest market for this product was in the UK where 1 million Euros was sold in 1999 and that increased by 5.5 times in 2004. Interestingly the sales volume of the faritrade bananas decreased in Sweden and Denmark in 2004 than that of 1999.
The lowest amount of sales for fairtrade-labelled coffee could be seen in Sweden and it was Denmark and Sweden where the lowest amount of fairtrade-labelled bananas were sold in both years .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Sri Wahyuningsih | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Sonya Hsieh | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rele 73
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d Sweden, the numbers stayed steady and didnt make any notably changes. In 1999, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...rtrade-labelled coffee in UK stood at 1.5 millions of Euros. Five years later, this number ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... also increased over 500%. Meanwhile , Switzerland was the largest market for ...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...labelled bananas were sold in both years .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14035087719 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2514646983 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469298245614 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1260991721 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259886839838 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126747130573 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543506331034 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173987982128 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152733834693 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.