Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?
What is your opinion on that?
From ancient days, a huge proportion of high-level jobs has always been held by men. Whether it is the head of the state or CEO of any multinational company, men has conquered most of the peaks. However, in this materialistic epoch, some people assert that government should reserve the seats for women for the sake of inequality among both sexes while others condemn this viewpoint and say intellectual development should be prioritized rather than gender. I counterbalance this notion. This essay will scrutinize both virtues.
Advocates of the first viewpoint say that in this contemporary scenario, individuals are most sincere to establish the equal power of men and women thus it is reasonable to provide the required opportunities to the female counterpart. However, it will succor the females in decision-making and all other indispensable aspects of a career which are crucial for the holistic development. Also, the evil like male dominance in the developing countries like Bangladesh, India, Turkmenistan, and more will be eliminated with such an appropriate step.
On the flip side, proponents of the second notion say that reservation will cause domestic violence among male gender and thus the crime rate will burgeon up. In addition, the government should introduce policies to eradicate such troubles and boost the education facilities of girls so that the regarded weaker gender can excel at its own. Last but not least, such a move can also lead to lowering the productivity and growth of any nation by providing positions to inexperienced employees.
Mulling over the topic, Undoubtedly, there are a plethora of females on the high-designations but this proportion is ignorable contrasted to the males. In my opinion, authorities should encourage and support women so that they can reach heights in lieu of reservation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-15 | agyapalsingh | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-08 | ngocdo315 | 72 | view |
- Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.What are reasons for this?Does it have a good or bad effect on children? 84
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 11
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, thus, while, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32876712329 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13062404412 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0914657059 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206080659693 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594574318588 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568597877237 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114410062752 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639050790528 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.