Children nowadays watch significantly more television than in the past, which reduces their activity levels accordingly. Why is this case?
What measures can you suggest to encourage higher levels of activity among children?
Nowsaday, as the living spaces become narrower, there are less land for outside activities. It is to some extent eliminate the children's enjoyment for being outdoor. They tend to stay all day long in house watching television. In this paper I want to personally point out some consequences results in this outcome as well as give some recommendation for changing their behaviours.
Children living in modern society have to endure a lot. One of the endurements, as I stated above, is having rarely space for playing outside. The over-exploding population around the world leads to the predicament that land supply cannot meet the demand. An enormous number of construction was given birth unconsciously, and such when they are completed that people could find out that even and one meter square haven't left. There are hardly places for walking regardless of playing.
Being locked up at home is also another unforgettable childhood experiment, which significantly leads to the increasing rate of some dilemmas include watching TV among children. When adults have business to go out, they often lock their children up at home with some instant snacks and an already-turned-on television. This actio is reasonable as the surroundings nowsaday are too dangerous for immatures to wander around. Gradually, they get on with the television and keep enjoying it.
How can we chang this habit and encourage children to be more energetic? From my standpoint the actions of government/society as well as family take decisive roles. Government must public rules and regulations about encouraging the expand and establishment of parks and playing lands. Family, especially parnts must spend a specific amount of time daily with the children. As those concerns are improved, certainly children's behaviour will change positively to some extent.
The fact of over-watching television among children impact negatively on the evolution of the society. We must take the act of changing their behaviour as an alarmed matter that must be resolved as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-14 | Hanh Nguyen | 95 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount ofsupport they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 78
- As children become adults, their social behaviour changes in some ways.What are the main differences between young children’s social behaviour and that of adults? To what extent are thechanges that take place good?Give reasons for your answer and includ 73
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of thesociety in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount ofsupport they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 91
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...find out that even and one meter square havent left. There are hardly places for walki...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rules and regulations about encouraging the expand and establishment of parks and playing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33846153846 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05478807408 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9694152082 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164214106038 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488070857391 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529821364365 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915942846641 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039483192529 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...find out that even and one meter square havent left. There are hardly places for walki...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rules and regulations about encouraging the expand and establishment of parks and playing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33846153846 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05478807408 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9694152082 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.75 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164214106038 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488070857391 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529821364365 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915942846641 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039483192529 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.