The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.
The line graph compares the expenditure on books in four different countries over a 10 year period from 1995 to 2005.
It is clear from the line graph that all the amounts of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy, Austria increased noticeably. Additionally, the figure for Germany was by far the highest amount of money during the research period.
In 1995, the expenses on books in Germany was highest, at $80 million. By contrast, the figure for Austria was significantly lower, at only $30 million. About $55 million of books were spent by people from France compared to $50 million from Italy. After 1999, although the amount of money the German spending on books decreased significantly, it was higher than the starting figure of the period, at approximately $85 million. Meanwhile, the other three figures gradually went up.
In 2005, the expenditure on books in Germany rose slightly to roughly $98 million and became the highest figure compared to other countries, while the amount of money wasted on books Italy and France gradually rose, at $62 million and $70 million, respectively. At the same time, the figure for Austria increased sharply from $40 million in 2001 to over $70 million at the end of the period.
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 67
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85576923077 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71840034649 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1854073581 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24977616689 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1143144432 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102240699694 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184794119217 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082472495663 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.