It is better for college students t live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
That where college students should choose to live has controversial. It is believed that staying at university campus bring more advantages for students than living with their families. I partly agree with this view.
To begin with, there are some benefits for students to live in schools. First and foremost, staying in college campus with the friends who are the same age provide people countless opportunities t develop a range of soft skills. For example, when students live in dormitory, they must cooperate with roommates, therefore abilities to adapt to different environments and work in team will increase. The also will know way to build the strong relationships and manage conflicts. This helps students a lot for their careers in the future. Secondly, college students are mature enough to live independently. The fact indicates that it is old enough for university students to have right to make their decisions. In addition, they will have more time to attend the extracurricular activities such as playing sports with friends. This helps students not only enlarge their knowledge but also improve their health.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that there are some negative effects on students when they are away from their parents. Firstly, there are not relatives who take care of them. For instance, when students are under the weather, they must learn way to care about themselves and sometimes, they can have a hard buying drugs or cooking meals. Moreover, they will receive the clear directions and essential advice in some circumstances since their parents have more experiences than students to make the right decisions.
In conclusion, although there are some benefits for college students to stay at home with their parents, I outweigh the advantages which living at schools bring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | chioma49 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | badboybmt123 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | lemaina201 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
- Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- 1.The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 198o and 2002 Summarise information and make comparison which relevant 67
- With an increasing population communicating via Internet and text message face to face communication will became a thing in the past To what extent do you agree 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22945205479 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72019364424 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7604929609 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410019925862 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141589808921 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112853668467 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305909213765 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126609614917 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.