Nowadays we see an increase in social problems involving teenagers. Many believe that it is because parents spend more time at work and less with their children. Do you agree or disagree
The nuclear family is much different from that was in the past. There is a significant decrease in the number of time parents allocate to their children. Many people argue this would have a negative correlation with juvenile social abnormalities. This will be proven by looking at how the absence of dual-income parents leads to anxiety as well as detrimental to mind welfare for their offspring.
First and for most, childhood is a formative period of lifespan. Parents who leave their children due to their busy work schedules induce their children to feel of abandon which leads to suffering more anxiety in their individual life. This can be more seen in American teenagers who are brought up by foster parents. It is clear that guardians cannot offer youngster real passion. Thus, as statistic reveals, the number of youth afflicted with social problems increase in these family.
Secondly, parents act as supervision while children devote the copious amount of time plug to computer games as well as virtual space. As an example, neglectful parents don not budget their time interacting with their children. This could encourage teenage children to spend too much time in virtual space which increases the risk of children falling victim crime and lead to a social problem as well. Consequently, it is obvious how the absence of parents have negative ramification on children social welfare.
To conclude, while parents are the breadwinner, they spend too much time at work rather than with their offspring, hence, it causes a negative impact on the children`s social development. This is due to lack of supervision and family integrity as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Hassan Riaz | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Hassan Riaz | 61 | view |
- Last month you had a holiday overseas where you stayed with some friends They have just sent you some photos of your holiday Write a letter to your friends In your letter thank them for the photos and for the holiday explain why you didn t write earlier i 90
- Write a letter to a company asking for a refund for something you bought from them online In your letter including What you bought What the problem is Why you want a refund 94
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.What are your opinions in this? 56
- You are going on a short holiday soon and would like to invite a friend to join you. Write a letter to him/her and say– Explain why you need a holiday.– Explain why you want your friend to come.– Where and when do you want to go? 73
- Environment problems facing today‘s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Governments and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.To what ex 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this family' or 'these families'?
Suggestion: this family; these families
...licted with social problems increase in these family. Secondly, parents act as supervision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76467030954 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562962962963 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4255688104 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312426704999 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991511780152 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807090742848 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198480810481 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034646307557 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.