The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given line graph illustrates the changes in four different types of food in a European from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that the consumption of fish was by far lowest during the research period. While the amount of beef, lamb and fish decreased, there was a sharp increase in the figure of chicken.
It can be seen from graph that in 1979, the amount of chicken consumed was the highest, at around 220 grams per person per week. The figures of chicken and lamb was lower, at just under 150 grams and exactly 150 grams respectively. However, the consumption of fish was the lowest, at about just over 50 grams.
It is also worth noting that in the period from 1979 to 2004, European country witnessed a dramatic rise in the amount of chicken eaten, increasing to 250 grams in 2004. By contrast, there was a slight decrease in the amount of fish and lamb, falling to 55 grams and 50 grams in 2004 respectively. Although, the consumption of beef increased and reached a peak in 1983 with just under 250 grams, this declined to just over 100 grams in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- The amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria 67
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv 84
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Describe a pet you have 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eclined to just over 100 grams in 2004.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52849740933 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41312865059 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1579740694 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193959837963 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092472361589 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656572784134 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137763211911 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625176866479 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.