Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
There are myriad factors or considerations which take into account that a profession which favor work five days a week for shorter hours. As far as I am concerned, according to the following reasons and some of my personal experience, I am of the conviction that it is more enjoyable to have a job for long hours in three days a week. Someone may consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. My reasons will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, the most enjoyable thing in this kind of job is that you can spend more time with your family. By working only three days a week can make life feasible so that you can complete your dream in your holidays. My own experience is a good example of this. I am working in a company where I have to work for three days a week, I like my job very much because of the extra holidays. Although, I have to work extra for long hours but in other four days I take rest and enjoy my leisure time. Therefore, it is more delightful to take this kind of job.
Apart from above-mentioned facts, an interesting way to find new perspective is to look toward some of the statistics revealed by many studies done on this field. These researchers provide at least somewhat scientific models to objectively shed some light on the topic and try to quantify the prevalent thinking on it as per various formulas. According to a recent study conducted in my country, most of the employees feel comfortable in a job which provides more holidays. This further corroborates my stance that long hours working for only three days a week gives a chance to fulfill dreams. For instance, people can take extra classes after their working time which give them a chance to get more success in life. Additionally, some people like to do a part-time job, they can achieve almost all dreams by this kind of job.
Admittedly, there are som justifications that everyone like a regular shift because of its reliable schedule and it does not take long hour work which is sometimes going hectic. Regular hour job is like a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it provide a way to come home at the time and spend some fixed hour with your loved ones, on the other hand, it is going to be hectic to go to the office regularly without enough holidays. Sometimes, life is going to be boring. Nonetheless, I still affirm that job for three days in a week is more likely.
In summary, by all aforementioned reasons, one can infer that an enjoyable profession makes a healthy life because you do not have to take much stress if one can like his job. Therefore, a job for three days a week is more beneficial than a job with five days a week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... find new perspective is to look toward some of the statistics revealed by many studies don...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 246, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...double-edged sword: on the one hand, it provide a way to come home at the time and spen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, apart from, at least, for instance, in summary, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48049281314 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61656275825 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466119096509 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4745053953 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469723250691 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140194175477 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127803272282 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287937336428 0.150856017488 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107651981113 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.